Silk Road Conjectures
  • Home
  • Contact
  • Schedule
  • 1582 Surname
  • Historical reproduction clothing
  • Silk Road Conjectures Blog
  • Travel blog: Istanbul 2012
  • References
    • Textile Technology
  • Links
  • Articles
    • Central Asian Caftans
  • Persian taj diadems: Historical reproductions
  • How to wear Persian stuff on your head

Glue is bad.

11/28/2018

0 Comments

 
Picture

I feel like I don't post on here often enough and I think my problem is that I tend to write such long posts that they are easy to put off.  So I want to disrupt that pattern by trying out some shorter posts where I limit myself to a single cool thing.

And I'm constantly finding new cool things as I am writing the book.  

So we know that in the Ottoman empire some garments were made at home and some came from royal workshops. We also know that there were commercial tailor's shops and guilds. And we also know that humans are sometimes lazy.

So a ferace is  essentially an Ottoman overcoat. It was lined, sometimes with fabric and sometimes with fur and it featured facings on the edges of the garment at the neck, sleeves, center front and hem.

Caftans were frequently bordered this way as well. (And I have some new information about how the borders were sewn. More on that in the book, or in another post.) 

Picture
Picture
Both of these extant caftans are 16th c Ottoman.


In Fashion at the Ottoman Court, Taksin references municipal laws "in Istanbul, Bursa and Edirne dated 1502 but relying on laws from 1477, require that the fringe that crossed the front opening and the perimeter of a ferace's skirt could not be pasted with glue but had to be attached through sewing, as had been customary in earlier times."


I love finding random stuff like this. It gives me a different perspective and that is a good thing.  One of the main challenges with early Ottoman clothing research is that while we have a lot of extant garments, they are mostly ones that were made for high-ranking members of the court. And the ones that are chosen for display in museums and reproduced in books are the fancy, splashy, unusual complicated ones that were worn for very formal occasions.

It's like if the only sources our descendants had for early 21st century clothing were things that were worn on the red carpet at the Academy Awards.

Interesting, but hugely, massively skewed.


So the glue laws makes me ask myself a bunch of questions.

1. How common was this practice, really? (The fact that legislation persisted in time and location tells me it wasn't just a law aimed at that jerk who has a shop near Galata Bridge)

2. Was it something that bothered people or did they just know that if you bought a garment at a particular price point that you needed to take the time to hand-sew the facings on yourself?

3. Could someone look at a garment being worn and be able to tell that it had cheap glued borders?

4. Did the glue saturate the fabric and soak through? 

5. Did the glued border change the way the garment hung?

6. What kind of glue?

7. What price range are we talking about?

Any thoughts, my darlings?

(So this is what a 'short post' looks like, apparently.)


0 Comments



Leave a Reply.


    Archives

    February 2020
    January 2020
    November 2019
    October 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    July 2018
    April 2018
    December 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    January 2017
    September 2016
    March 2016
    September 2015
    January 2013
    December 2012
    June 2012

    Categories

    All
    Being Wrong
    Central Asia
    Cloud Collars
    Conservation Issues
    Embroidery
    Extant Garment
    Headwear
    Mongol
    Music
    Musician
    Period Techniques
    Phoenix
    Poetry
    Research Methods
    The Cloud Collar Project
    Turku

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.